I have finally decided to voice my opinion
about the atrocious acts of Islamic State (IS), and contemplate on the question
that everybody is trying to answer, “How to respond?” Unfortunately some have
already responded to the question with violence. My perceived radical Christian
views tell me that responding to an already violent conflict is in
contradiction with The Way that Jesus gave us about 2,000 years ago. The
previous point can be argued extensively, if the followers of Jesus should use
any type of violence. I will continue with my post on the assumption that the
followers of Jesus should refrain from using any types of violent force. I also
believe that a non-violent resolution is philosophically approachable by
atheists and other religious communities, not just Christians.
The answer that most
governments, like the United States, have reached, is to use violence to
eradicate the perceived enemy. The perceived enemy might even be considered by
some as a created enemy, or an enemy that could have been prevented if certain
past violent actions or economic sanctions were not taken. Did the US and other
Western countries create the enemy we see today? I don’t know the answer to the
question, but I do believe we should consider the origin of IS in order to
accurately assess the path that should be taken in order to eliminate the
current violence.
We
obviously can’t let the violence continue. The recent massacre of yet to be
confirmed Ethiopian Christians in Libya as showed on a recently released video
is inexcusable, but it seems that the recent rise in martyrs hasn’t stopped
even though some territories have been taken back from the opposition. Creating
a conservation with IS seems to be an appropriate first step. The dilemma that
we confront is the lack of negotiation that IS leaders have. I am far removed
from the situation, so coming up with real solutions without being on the
ground is next to impossible. I only hope that confessed Christians would find
a different way to “fight” the violence that both the supposed good and bad are
producing. In the end, I think, the choice between someone dying and living
should be in the hands of God, not in the hands of drone pilot sitting in a
comfortable chair a thousand miles away, or the wielder of a very sharp sword.
Back to starting the conversation
with the “enemy”. IS appears to want a supposed Islamic Caliphate, but most of
the over 1.5 billion Muslims would agree that ISIS is creating an “Un-Islamic
State”, which I would agree with. I am not a Qur’an scholar, so I couldn’t say
if the Qur’an actually supports the view of IS, but after reading the five
pillars of Islam, I could say that none of the five pillars support the violence
that is being used by IS. An outsider view of the Bible would also display the
same image, that killing is not allowed, hints the 5th commandment
given to Moses. There seems to be just as many “Christians” who support
killings as there are “Muslims”, and maybe even more “Christians” supporters
considering Christianity has almost one billion more followers.
Rather than trying to talk to
the leaders of IS, we should talk to the folks behind the scenes. The people
giving money to the cause, the people trying to live within IS’s territory.
Starting a grassroots movement against IS supported by former members of IS is
one idea. The amount of lives lost has not reached the toll left behind the
Third Reich, and within the Third Reich there was opposition. Some lost their
lives to supporting the truth, like Sophie Scholl of the White Rose non-violent
resistance group. The resistance groups trying to undermine the Nazis were
small and probably a bit unorganized, but they sought a kind of peace that
can’t be achieved through the use of violent force. The end of the Third Reich
was brought down by violent force, but have we really seen the end of groups
like the Third Reich?
The answer to the problem of IS
won’t be found in my blog post, but it also won’t be found in bombs and
bullets. The answer might be found in government budgets. The amount in the
military defense budget of the US far exceeds the amount of foreign economic
aid that the government gives. Does this mean that US tax dollars are killing
people more than they are helping people; this might be true. I wonder how the
world would look like if the spending was flipped.
My view of the subject might
seem unrealistic and naïve, but I think the naïve view is the one that most
governments support. Obviously it is not working! We can’t stand by and watch
our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ parish (meaning all humans). I call
for all Christians to become supporters of proactive nonviolence that Jesus
teaches us, and may we never concede to support a war or any war that could
never be just under the eyes of God.
I offer up a simple prayer-
Dear Lord,
I ask that you might strengthen our faith in
the words and actions that your son Jesus Christ gave us many years ago. I also
ask that you be with the families that are suffering from violence and
persecution. May you also guide those that have vast amounts of control over
the lives of your people, ALL humans. I pray that you will guide those
individuals and ourselves to always choose non-violence when faced with evil.
May you always be with us, Lord! Amen